Last night we covered more evidence for the truth and
reliability of the New Testament. As we set out to discover if:
-- we have accurate copies of the original NT documents.
(See last week’s blog for that review.)
--the original NT documents tell the truth.
We can remember the Six E’s of evidence that the NT
is true. (These are the same types of evidence we would look for in any
historical work from antiquity.)
·
Early Testimony—we know that all or most
of the NT was written before 70 A.D.—so within a 1-2 generations of Christ’s
death. (no time for myth or legend to develop without being debunked.)
·
Eyewitness Testimony—among other
convincing proofs: 84 historically confirmed eyewitness details in Acts, more
in Luke’s Gospel, 59 historically confirmed or probable details in John, NT
documents have more than 30 people confirmed by secular sources of archaeology.
·
Embarrassing Testimony—someone making up
a story would not include embarrassing details about themselves; apostles are
portrayed in NT as dimwitted, uncaring, rebuked, cowards and doubters among
other uncomplimentary traits.
·
Excruciating Testimony—all but one
apostle is thought to have died a martyr’s death. Why would they die for a
known lie? They had nothing to gain by making up this new religion.
·
Expected Testimony—through reason and
science we know that God exists and created us for a purpose (covered in
earlier sessions); the OT teaches the same and it can be considered reliable
and the OT predicts the Messiah would come; the prophetic details of that
Messiah in the OT are pinpoint accurate in what we see of Jesus in the NT.
·
Extra-Biblical Testimony—we have 10
ancient non-Christian sources confirming the NT storyline and when you compile
their work you get a story congruent with the NT.
We are able to show through these evidences that the NT is
historically reliable. Therefore:
1)
It is fact, not fiction
2)
If it says Jesus said it, then Jesus really said
it.
3)
If it says Jesus did it, then Jesus really did
it.
Next we will move into evidence for the resurrection (many
of you got a taste for that in the “Case for Easter” simulcast), who Jesus is,
what he taught about the Bible and what that means for us.
My “bribe” from last week still stands. J
No comments:
Post a Comment